Dạng so sánh 2 đối tượng

Model snippet

Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Some people believe that it is better to plant trees in cities than to build more houses. I completely agree with this idea. This position can be demonstrated by examining how trees bring important environmental benefits, while building too many houses can cause serious social problems. On the one hand, urban tree planting plays a pivotal role in enhancing environmental quality in cities. Trees absorb harmful pollutants such as carbon dioxide and release oxygen, contributing to cleaner air. This becomes especially important in major cities, where traffic and industry release vast emissions. For instance, in overcrowded cities like Hanoi or Jakarta, green spaces are often referred to as 'urban lungs'. Such environmental benefits undermine the argument that constructing more homes is more important than green areas. On the other hand, excessive housing development at the expense of green spaces can significantly diminish the quality of urban life. When land is used almost exclusively for residential buildings, it leaves little room for parks or pedestrian-friendly zones. This can leave residents confined to cramped apartments with limited chances to relax. Over time, such conditions may contribute to stress and mental health issues. Taken together, these problems raise valid concerns about prioritising housing over urban greenery. In conclusion, although cities need more housing to support growing populations, I believe that planting trees should come first, because green areas protect the environment and improve quality of life, while too much construction can make cities unhealthy and crowded.