Với đề chỉ có một nhận định, cách an toàn và rõ ràng nhất là chọn đồng ý hoàn toàn HOẶC không đồng ý hoàn toàn, rồi đưa ra 2 lý do độc lập để bảo vệ quan điểm. Giữ stance nhất quán từ Intro đến Conclusion.
Khung bài & phương pháp
Mở bài — Intro: Background + Thesis + Outline
Paraphrase bối cảnh, nêu rõ đồng ý/không đồng ý, rồi giới thiệu 2 hướng phân tích.
- The use of ... is increasing rapidly in the modern world ... (Background).
- Despite this, it is disagreed that ... (Thesis).
- Analysing ... and ... will show this (Outline).
Thân 1 — Body 1: Lý do thứ nhất
Topic sentence nêu lý do 1, giải thích, ví dụ cụ thể, rồi mini-conclusion.
- Firstly, ... would have difficulty ...
- For example, ...
- Thus, this makes it clear that ...
Thân 2 — Body 2: Lý do thứ hai
Topic sentence nêu lý do 2, giải thích, ví dụ, mini-conclusion phản bác/khẳng định.
- Secondly, ... would not be able to ...
- As most would agree that ...
- ... the argument that ... can be debunked.
Kết bài — Conclusion: Tóm tắt + Restate
Gói lại 2 lý do và khẳng định lại quan điểm một lần nữa.
- In summary, ...
- Thus, it is clear why ...
- As this essay has shown, ...
Model snippet
Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent ... technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree?
The use of technology is increasing rapidly in the modern world and growing technological influence can even be seen in the classroom. Despite this, it is disagreed that technology will completely replace the classroom teacher in the foreseeable future. Analysing the inability of a technology-driven teacher to both cater to student learning needs and instill motivation will show this.
Firstly, a teacher powered by artificial intelligence would have difficulty interpreting the educational needs of a classroom of students. For example, one of the world's most advanced robots has trouble distinguishing simple human emotions. If today's most advanced AI cannot categorise these basic cues, it is difficult to believe a robot could alter study plans in a dynamic classroom. Thus, this makes it clear that a technology-driven teacher is not going to be operational anytime soon.
Secondly, a robotic teacher would not be able to establish the emotional connection needed to motivate students. Educational theory widely supports the idea that young learners are most motivated when they share an emotional relationship with their instructor. As most would agree that expecting children to form emotional ties to machinery is unrealistic, the argument that technology will replace the teacher can be debunked.
In summary, a robotic teacher would lack the classroom dynamism and emotional intelligence needed to be an effective instructor. As this essay has shown, computer technology will not replace traditional human teachers in the foreseeable future.