Dạng 2 quan điểm trong đề

Model snippet

Pollution and other environmental damage are caused by a country developing and becoming richer. This problem cannot be avoided. To what extent do you agree? It is often believed that economic development inevitably leads to environmental degradation. While this might hold true in some cases, I disagree that such negative consequences are unavoidable. This essay will argue that both developing and developed nations contribute to environmental problems, and that with the right strategies, growth can go hand in hand with protection. To begin with, the notion that pollution is solely caused by developing countries striving for wealth is fundamentally flawed. Many advanced economies are also major contributors. Take China for example: although it is a leading economy, it still suffers from severe air pollution and often tops the list of greenhouse gas emissions. This demonstrates that environmental harm is tied to governmental priorities, not a country's stage of development. Moreover, it is incorrect to assume that environmental damage is an inevitable trade-off for progress. With careful planning, countries can grow without harming the environment. A prime example is Sweden, which combines prosperity with sustainability by investing in renewable energy and enforcing strict regulations while maintaining high living standards. This suggests that nations can grow richer while protecting ecosystems. In conclusion, although development can pose environmental challenges, these are not inevitable. Both developing and developed countries contribute to ecological problems, and effective policies can mitigate them. Therefore, the idea that progress must come at the expense of the environment is an oversimplification.